shakedsetc.org
  • Home
  • Folios and Quartos
  • 18th Century Editions
  • 19th Century Editions
  • 20th Century Editions
  • The Fifth Folio (1700)
  • Companion Marlowe site!
  • New Variorum I 1871-1955
  • First Arden 1899-1924
  • Red-Letter Shakespeare
  • Women Edit Shakespeare
  • Restoration Adaptations
  • Conjectures and Notes
  • Biography
  • Collier Forgeries
  • Historical Criticism
  • Lexicons and More
  • Furnivall Facsimiles
  • Malone Society Reprints
  • Tudor Facsimile Texts
  • Bibliographia
  • Shakespeare Media Archive
  • Lost Plays Database
  • More
    • Home
    • Folios and Quartos
    • 18th Century Editions
    • 19th Century Editions
    • 20th Century Editions
    • The Fifth Folio (1700)
    • Companion Marlowe site!
    • New Variorum I 1871-1955
    • First Arden 1899-1924
    • Red-Letter Shakespeare
    • Women Edit Shakespeare
    • Restoration Adaptations
    • Conjectures and Notes
    • Biography
    • Collier Forgeries
    • Historical Criticism
    • Lexicons and More
    • Furnivall Facsimiles
    • Malone Society Reprints
    • Tudor Facsimile Texts
    • Bibliographia
    • Shakespeare Media Archive
    • Lost Plays Database
shakedsetc.org
  • Home
  • Folios and Quartos
  • 18th Century Editions
  • 19th Century Editions
  • 20th Century Editions
  • The Fifth Folio (1700)
  • Companion Marlowe site!
  • New Variorum I 1871-1955
  • First Arden 1899-1924
  • Red-Letter Shakespeare
  • Women Edit Shakespeare
  • Restoration Adaptations
  • Conjectures and Notes
  • Biography
  • Collier Forgeries
  • Historical Criticism
  • Lexicons and More
  • Furnivall Facsimiles
  • Malone Society Reprints
  • Tudor Facsimile Texts
  • Bibliographia
  • Shakespeare Media Archive
  • Lost Plays Database

Folios

First Folio (F1), 1623

Second Folio (F2), 1632

Second Folio (F2), 1632

This is my photograph of the University of London copy, Senate House.  Below are the Folger and BL sites.


Here is the late Queen’s copy at the Bodleian, Oxon


Here is the copy from the Walter Havighurst Special Collections Library at Miami University

Second Folio (F2), 1632

Second Folio (F2), 1632

Second Folio (F2), 1632

Some still mistakenly believe that this editor merely updated F1 without providing any true editorial stewardship. However, A. W. Pollard (1909) asserted that this was untrue, albeit without providing any examples. The American scholar he scorned, Charles Alphonso Smith (1902), actually documents many instances that show F2 truly rethinking and revising F1. Charles I owned a copy and wrote in it.  My photo, University of London, Senate House.


Second Folio from Havighurst Collection, Miami University

Third Folio (F3), 1663-64

Third Folio (F3), 1663-64

Third Folio (F3), 1663-64

There are two versions of the Third Folio (1663, 1664) that differ in one crucial respect. One contains seven more plays than the other. The first, sometimes known as F3a, was once thought to be merely a reprint of F2. Yet recent scholarship has detected evidence of substantial editing. The one in the picture link above is sometimes known as F3b (1664): it added seven plays now known to be apocryphal.  Here is a link to F3a (1663), the first printing.  Boston Public Library.


Third Folio (F3b, 1664) from Havighurst Collection, Miami University


Third Folio (F3b, 1664) from University of Buffalo

Fourth Folio (F4), 1685

Third Folio (F3), 1663-64

Third Folio (F3), 1663-64

The last no-name editor Folio, though quartos remained anonymously edited.  Rowe, Pope, Hanmer, Warburton, and even Dr. Johnson largely based their editions on F4. Senate House copy, University of London, my photo


Fourth Folio from Havighurst Collection, Miami University


Black and Shaaber, Shakespeare's Seventeenth-century Editors, 1632-1685 (1937)

"Fifth Folio" (F5), 1700

  • Great textual scholarship, beginning with Fredson Bowers and Giles Dawson (1951) and continuing with Eric Rasmussen (1998, 2017), determined that several copies of the Fourth Folio contained an odd feature.  It was printed in three sections, but in several volumes its middle part made up of history plays and the tragedies to Romeo and Juliet (sigs. 2B-3E8v) did not originally contain the requisite seventeen sheets to make sixty-eight pages. As a result, the printers and publishers needed to reprint the missing material and add it to the deficient Folios. 
  • Although this act of expediency did not constitute a truly new edition, contemporary Shakespeareans nevertheless now refer to the additions as an approximation of a "Fifth Folio," perhaps for convenience's sake.  Since this repair work might have been perpetrated in a hurry, probably at the turn of the eighteenth century, those responsible did not completely encase the usual two columns of text in boxed-rule lines, including the sides and the bottom, as was the usual practice. Therefore, it is fairly easy to distinguish between F4 and F5 by identifying this anomaly, seen in the first page of 2 Henry VI in Folger copy 28. The watermarks between the two differ as well.  
  • There appear to be seven extant copies of F4 with F5 sheets: four at the Folger, two at the New York Public Library, and one in private hands.  W. W. Greg once predicted that many more would be found, but that has not as of yet come to pass, in spite of considerable effort by Dr. Rasmussen and his colleagues.
  • Dawson, "Some Bibliographical Irregularities in the Shakespeare Fourth Folio" (1951-52)
  • Bowers, "Robert Roberts: A Printer of Shakespeare's Fourth Folio" (1951)
  • Rasmussen, "Anonymity and the Erasure of Shakespeare's First Eighteenth-Century Editor," in Reading Readings, ed. Gondris (1998)
  • Hansen and Rasmussen, "Shakespeare without Rules," in Canonising Shakespeare, eds. Depledge and Kirwan (2017)
  • A list of the reprinted pages in the seven copies of F5
  • A link to this website's Fifth Folio page, including the facsimile edition

FSL, BL, ISE Facsimiles

Folger Shakespeare Library Folios and Quartos

 Here is the Folger's online copy of a First Folio with page images, entire.  

British Library Folios and Quartos

 The British Library's First Folio page. They have quartos in abundance. 


CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE ⚒

Internet Shakespeare Editions, University of Victoria

Internet Shakespeare Editions, University of Victoria

This remains the best site for examining Shakespeare facsimiles.


Become a friend of the ISE

Quartos

Venus and Adonis (Q1593)

Titus Andronicus (Q1 1594)

Titus Andronicus (Q1 1594)

The sole surviving copy

Titus Andronicus (Q1 1594)

Titus Andronicus (Q1 1594)

Titus Andronicus (Q1 1594)

The only known copy

2 Henry VI (Q1 1594)

Titus Andronicus (Q1 1594)

The Rape of Lucrece (Q1594)

The First Part of the Contention betwixt the famous Houses of Yorke and Lancaster became Henry VI, Part Two, in Shakespeare scholarship, since the first part of the tetralogy showed up in F1

The Rape of Lucrece (Q1594)

The Rape of Lucrece (Q1594)

The Rape of Lucrece (Q1594)

Lucrece 

Richard III (Q1 1597)

The Rape of Lucrece (Q1594)

Richard III (Q1 1597)

Richard III  

3 Henry VI (1600)

The Rape of Lucrece (Q1594)

Richard III (Q1 1597)

The true Tragedie of Richard Duke of Yorke became Henry VI, Part Three.  

The Passionate Pilgrim (Q1 1599)

The Passionate Pilgrim (Q1 1599)

The Passionate Pilgrim (Q1 1599)

Passionate Pilgrim Q1

The Edward Dowden facsimile

Love's Labour's Lost (Q1 1598)

The Passionate Pilgrim (Q1 1599)

The Passionate Pilgrim (Q1 1599)

Love's Labour's Lost Q1

The British Library quarto, courtesy of ISE. The first title-page with Shakespeare's name on it. 

The Taming of a Shrew (Q1 1594)

The Passionate Pilgrim (Q1 1599)

The Taming of a Shrew (Q1 1594)

1594 title page of A Shrew

This anonymous play has sometimes been attributed to Shakespeare or considered to be an earlier or even competing version of the F1 text.  It is strange that no quarto of the comedy we know as Shakespeare's survives except the 1631 version, published just before F2. 



Romeo and Juliet (Q1 1597)

Romeo and Juliet (Q1 1597)

Romeo and Juliet (Q1 1597)

"cut him out in little stars"

Richard II (Q1 1597)

Romeo and Juliet (Q1 1597)

Romeo and Juliet (Q1 1597)

Historically famous, since the Earl of Essex was said to have the deposition scene performed in 1599 during his rebellion.

1 Henry IV (Q1 1598)

Romeo and Juliet (Q1 1597)

1 Henry IV (Q1 1598)

Falstaff already well known

2 Henry IV (Q1600)

A Midsummer Night's Dream (Q1 1600)

1 Henry IV (Q1 1598)

Even more love for Falstaff

Henry V (Q1 1600)

A Midsummer Night's Dream (Q1 1600)

A Midsummer Night's Dream (Q1 1600)

Important

A Midsummer Night's Dream (Q1 1600)

A Midsummer Night's Dream (Q1 1600)

A Midsummer Night's Dream (Q1 1600)

The second title-page featuring Shakespeare's name.

The Merchant of Venice (Q1 1600)

The Merry Wives of Windsor (Q1 1602)

The Merchant of Venice (Q1 1600)

Merchant  

Much Ado About Nothing (Q1600)

The Merry Wives of Windsor (Q1 1602)

The Merchant of Venice (Q1 1600)

The play

The Merry Wives of Windsor (Q1 1602)

The Merry Wives of Windsor (Q1 1602)

The Merry Wives of Windsor (Q1 1602)

Enjoyed

Hamlet (Q1 1603, Q2 1604)

Troilus and Cressida (Q1 1609)

The Merry Wives of Windsor (Q1 1602)

Probably the two most studied quartos in Shakespeare studies, the first often misnamed "the bad quarto" by scholars who didn't understand it might have been an acting version of the play.


The copies below are from the Huntington Library digital collection in San Marino, California


Q1 1603    Q2 1604

King Lear (Q1 1608)

Troilus and Cressida (Q1 1609)

Troilus and Cressida (Q1 1609)

Much disputed

Troilus and Cressida (Q1 1609)

Troilus and Cressida (Q1 1609)

Troilus and Cressida (Q1 1609)

Two early versions

Pericles (Q1 1609)

The Sonnets (Q1609)

The Sonnets (Q1609)

Earliest printed version of the play known, not included in First Folio. 

The Sonnets (Q1609)

The Sonnets (Q1609)

The Sonnets (Q1609)

This somewhat mysteriously published quarto and its odd prolegomena have led to much unwarranted and unseemly speculation about Shakespeare and his life. 

Othello (Q1 1622)

The Sonnets (Q1609)

The Taming of the Shrew (Q1 1631)

Though the play was known and performed almost two decades earlier, it did not appear in quarto until the year before F1.  

The Taming of the Shrew (Q1 1631)

Poems by Will. Shakespeare, Gent. (1640)

The Taming of the Shrew (Q1 1631)

The odd doppelganger of Shakespeare's play is The Taming of a Shrew (1594), of unknown authorship but similar in many particulars. This quarto seems late, but Charles I liked Shakespeare. 

The Two Noble Kinsmen (Q1634)

Poems by Will. Shakespeare, Gent. (1640)

Poems by Will. Shakespeare, Gent. (1640)

John Fletcher

Poems by Will. Shakespeare, Gent. (1640)

Poems by Will. Shakespeare, Gent. (1640)

Poems by Will. Shakespeare, Gent. (1640)

Frequently dismissed as a mashup of Shakespeare's sonnets and poems, since the publisher and editor, John Benson, changed pronouns and the ordering of several sonnets or combined them. Yet it is important in reception studies of Shakespeare's nondramatic poetry. 

Pavier Quartos

A False Folio?


This is a collection of ten quarto play texts that William Jaggard printed for Thomas Pavier in 1619, though some of the title-pages are falsely dated. There are two known volumes in contemporary binding, one at the Folger and the other at Texas Christian University. Other copies of the Pavier editions exist singly. W. W. Greg and others theorized that the collection might have been an early attempt at a Shakespeare collection. Some spurious works (Yorkshire Tragedy, Sir John Oldcastle) are included.


Folger Pavier page

TCU Pavier page


Dr. Zachary Lesser's excellent recent study, Ghosts, Holes, Rips and Scrapes: Shakespeare in 1619, Bibliography in the Longue Durée (2021), is the most complete and wide-ranging study.  From the publisher's website:


Four years before the publication of the First Folio, a group of London printers and booksellers attempted to produce a "collected works" of William Shakespeare, not in an imposingly large format but as a series of more humble quarto pamphlets. For mysterious reasons, perhaps involving Shakespeare's playing company, the King's Men, the project ran into trouble. In an attempt to salvage it, information on the title pages of some of the playbooks was falsified, making them resemble leftover copies of earlier editions. The deception worked for nearly three hundred years, until it was unmasked by scholars in the early twentieth century. The discovery of these "Pavier Quartos," as they became known, was a landmark success for the New Bibliography and played an important role in establishing the validity and authority of that method of analysis. While more recent scholars have reassessed the traditional narrative that the New Bibliographers wrote, no one has gone back to look at the primary evidence: the quartos themselves.


In Ghosts, Holes, Rips and Scrapes Zachary Lesser undertakes a completely fresh study of these playbooks. Through an intensive bibliographical analysis of over three hundred surviving quartos, Lesser reveals evidence that has gone entirely unseen before: "ghosts" (faint, oily impressions produced when one book is bound next to another); "holes" (the tiny remains of the first simple stitching that held pamphlets together); and "rips and scrapes" (post-production alterations of title pages). This new evidence—much of it visible only with the aid of enhanced photographic methods—suggests that the "Pavier Quartos" are far more mysterious, with far more consequential ramifications for book history and Shakespeare scholarship than we have thought.


Excerpt from the book

Ordering information from the University of Pennsylvania Press

Copyright © 2018-28  shakedsetc.org - All Rights Reserved.




Powered by